Despite the obvious grammatical error in the source text (...que cuenta con... así como ninguna), the idea is that the company should have "no legal impediment," presumably that would preclude it from entering into the agreement or performing the subject matter.

As I can't tell what comes next, you might need either "ABC has" or "there is".

"ABC guarantees to XYZ that ABC has all the legal and operating requirements and that it has/there is no legal impediment..."

I would be most surprised if it meant "interdiction," which, in English, is a term usually associated either with family law or an action designed to prevent something.