Glossary entry (derived from question below)
Spanish term or phrase:
citación contraria
English translation:
notification to the other party
Spanish term
citación contraria
PRUEBA: Se acompañan con citación contraria y como documentos números 1 a 2 copias testimoniadas de los Titulos de Conceción de las referidas Marcas y su registro en el Registro de la Propiedad Industrial, actualemente Oficina Española de Patentas y Marcas.
| 3 +2 | notification to the other party |
Jennifer Levey
|
| 4 | pleading/statement of case |
AllegroTrans
|
| something similar here (Federal Rules of Evidence) |
jacana54 (X)
|
Nov 17, 2008 02:04: mediamatrix (X) changed "Level" from "Non-PRO" to "PRO"
Dec 1, 2008 19:12: mediamatrix (X) Created KOG entry
PRO (3): Eloi Castellví Alonso, RichardDeegan, mediamatrix (X)
When entering new questions, KudoZ askers are given an opportunity* to classify the difficulty of their questions as 'easy' or 'pro'. If you feel a question marked 'easy' should actually be marked 'pro', and if you have earned more than 20 KudoZ points, you can click the "Vote PRO" button to recommend that change.
How to tell the difference between "easy" and "pro" questions:
An easy question is one that any bilingual person would be able to answer correctly. (Or in the case of monolingual questions, an easy question is one that any native speaker of the language would be able to answer correctly.)
A pro question is anything else... in other words, any question that requires knowledge or skills that are specialized (even slightly).
Another way to think of the difficulty levels is this: an easy question is one that deals with everyday conversation. A pro question is anything else.
When deciding between easy and pro, err on the side of pro. Most questions will be pro.
* Note: non-member askers are not given the option of entering 'pro' questions; the only way for their questions to be classified as 'pro' is for a ProZ.com member or members to re-classify it.
Proposed translations
Chile
Human-scale Globalization
Native in: English (Variant: British) 
Works in: Spanish to English, French to English, English to Spanish, and 2 more.
notification to the other party
| agree |
jacana54 (X)
: totalmente, quiere decir con citación de la parte contraria, yo tampoco sé el legalese
10 hrs
|
| agree |
Adrian MM. (X)
13 days
|
United Kingdom
Sensible solutions
Native in: English (Variant: Wessexois) 
Works in: French to English, English, English to French
pleading/statement of case
Case Information Statement. Class action. Class Action Fairness Act of 2005. Demurrer ... Pleadings are referred to as 'Statements of Case' ...
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pleading - Cached
pleading: Definition from Answers.com
pleading n. A plea; an entreaty. Law. Advocacy of causes in court. Law. A formal statement, generally ... the cause of action or the defense in a case. ...
www.answers.com/topic/pleading - 64k - Cached
Reference comments
something similar here (Federal Rules of Evidence)
(1) A party intending to offer evidence under subdivision (b) must --
(A) file a written motion at least 14 days before trial specifically describing the evidence and stating the purpose for which it is offered unless the court, for good cause requires a different time for filing or permits filing during trial; and
(B) serve the motion on all parties and notify the alleged victim or, when appropriate, the alleged victim's guardian or representative.
(2) Before admitting evidence under this rule the court must conduct a hearing in camera and afford the victim and parties a right to attend and be heard. The motion, related papers, and the record of the hearing must be sealed and remain under seal unless the court orders otherwise."
In your case, the documents are offered as evidence with the request that the motion to admit them be served on the other party.
The frase "se acompañan con citación contraria" is in fact shorthand for "se acompañan y se solicita su agregación con citación de la contraparte" i.e., that they be admitted as evidence but giving the other party a chance to question their admissibility.
Discussion