Feb 6, 2023 11:15
1 yr ago
29 viewers *
Russian term
не является основанием
Russian to English
Law/Patents
Law: Patents, Trademarks, Copyright
Неявка лица, извещенного о дате и месте заседания Апелляционного совета, *не является основанием* для не рассмотрения возражения.
can not be grounds for not reviewing the claim or objection?
Would be great if you suggest your translation for the whole sentence, I will compare with mine,
can not be grounds for not reviewing the claim or objection?
Would be great if you suggest your translation for the whole sentence, I will compare with mine,
Proposed translations
(English)
Proposed translations
+2
14 mins
Selected
can not be considered as a reason
Non-attendance by the parties at trial | Legal Guidancehttps://www.lexisnexis.co.uk › legal
·
Diese Seite übersetzen
16.12.2022 — Good reason for not attending. The court will examine all the evidence relevant to the party not attending and will seek to ascertain the true ...
4 KudoZ points awarded for this answer.
Comment: "Selected automatically based on peer agreement."
+1
10 mins
...is not a basis for
https://iccwbo.org/dispute-resolution-services/icann-gtld-pr...
--------------------------------------------------
Note added at 15 mins (2023-02-06 11:31:13 GMT)
--------------------------------------------------
The absence of a person who has been notified of the date and place of the meeting of the Board of Appeal *is not a basis* for not considering the objection.
--------------------------------------------------
Note added at 15 mins (2023-02-06 11:31:13 GMT)
--------------------------------------------------
The absence of a person who has been notified of the date and place of the meeting of the Board of Appeal *is not a basis* for not considering the objection.
+1
1 hr
should not prevent consideration
The non-appearance of the notified person of the date and place of the Board of Appeal meeting should not prevent consideration of the objection.
c
However, as Menzies raised the jurisdictional defense in her answer and Beacon never objected on the grounds of untimeliness or prejudice, this minor procedural defect by a pro se litigant should not prevent consideration of the jurisdictional issue on remand.
https://casetext.com/case/beacon-enterprises-inc-v-menzies
ccccccc
People v Wagman, 99 AD2d 519, 520), the failure of the court to properly explain to the jury the concept of extreme emotional disturbance and emphasize that the statutory presumption should not influence and should not prevent consideration of defendant's justification defense was error.
https://h2o.law.harvard.edu/collages/44002
c
However, as Menzies raised the jurisdictional defense in her answer and Beacon never objected on the grounds of untimeliness or prejudice, this minor procedural defect by a pro se litigant should not prevent consideration of the jurisdictional issue on remand.
https://casetext.com/case/beacon-enterprises-inc-v-menzies
ccccccc
People v Wagman, 99 AD2d 519, 520), the failure of the court to properly explain to the jury the concept of extreme emotional disturbance and emphasize that the statutory presumption should not influence and should not prevent consideration of defendant's justification defense was error.
https://h2o.law.harvard.edu/collages/44002
Peer comment(s):
agree |
Lesia Kutsenko
: the most concise)
16 mins
|
Thank you, Lesia. Have a great day!
|
18 hrs
it does not constitute grounds for
my option
Note from asker:
Yes, Thank you. That is what I am looking for, Lilian! |
So, my version is : The absence of a party notified of the date and place of the meeting does not consitute grounds for hearing the claim? Absence is better I think, than non-attendance or non-appearance? |
non-appearance might work as well. |
Something went wrong...