|
About the Articles Knowledgebase
|
ProZ.com has created this section with the goals of:
Further enabling knowledge sharing among professionals
Providing resources for the education of clients and translators
Offering an additional channel for promotion of ProZ.com members (as authors)
We invite your participation and feedback concerning this new resource.
|
|
|
|
|
Recent News
Featured Articles
»
Safeguarding Confidential Legal Translations with AI Tools
|
Legal translators often work with highly sensitive documents like contracts and agreements, where confidentiality is non-negotiable. While AI tools such as ChatGPT can significantly enhance translation speed and accuracy, they also pose potential risks if data handling is not carefully managed. To address this, translators must adopt responsible practices to balance the benefits of AI with the need for airtight security.
A key starting point is understanding the platform’s privacy policies. Translators should confirm whether their data is stored or shared and take steps to avoid using free or non-secure versions for sensitive material. Redacting sensitive information before inputting it into AI tools is another crucial step. Names, addresses, and other identifying details should be replaced with placeholders that can be restored after the translation is complete.
Breaking documents into smaller sections and translating them in chunks helps minimize risk, as does using encrypted connections when working online. Translators should also consider upgrading to enterprise-level AI tools, which often include enhanced security features such as end-to-end encryption and stricter data retention controls.
Additionally, avoiding file uploads altogether can protect hidden metadata that might inadvertently expose sensitive information. Offline tools like SDL Trados or MemoQ are excellent alternatives for projects requiring the highest levels of security. Regardless of the tools used, clearing session history and deleting temporary files after completing a project ensures no residual data remains accessible.
Non-disclosure agreements (NDAs) provide an extra layer of protection, outlining clear protocols for data handling. By combining AI-generated drafts with thorough manual reviews, translators can ensure accuracy while safeguarding client confidentiality.
Finally, staying informed about data protection regulations like GDPR and CCPA ensures compliance with legal standards, particularly for international projects. Transparency with clients about security measures further reinforces trust and professionalism. By adopting these strategies, legal translators can harness AI tools like ChatGPT without compromising the confidentiality that is fundamental to their work.
|
Recent Articles
»
Carry On, Conduct, Perform, or Carry Out? The Verb That Goes with
|
The article explains how to choose the right verb when translating references to “business” in legal English. Use "carry on" for operating a business, "conduct" for how it is run, "perform" for obligations or services, "carry out" for tasks or resolutions, and "transact" for agenda items at meetings. When translating Indonesian verbs such as 'melakukan' and 'melaksanakan', focus on the object rather than translating the verb mechanically. Always check the target jurisdiction’s statutes and standard contracts for established usage.
|
»
When Correct English Is Still the Wrong Translation
|
A grammatically correct translation can still change agency, action, commitment, or interpersonal force. Using Korean-to-English examples, this article proposes a practical four-part QA check for identifying functional accuracy problems that ordinary linguistic review can miss.
|
»
Omission to Act in Legal Translation: Why Ketiadaan Tindakan Is the Safer Indonesian Equivalent
|
How should omission to act be rendered in Indonesian? This article tests four common candidates, namely kelalaian bertindak, keengganan bertindak, kegagalan bertindak, and ketiadaan tindakan, against the term's dictionary meaning and its role in the common law doctrine of the duty to act. It argues that omission denotes only the absence of an act, without implying reluctance, fault, or a breached duty. A bilingual indemnity clause shows how kelalaian bertindak can narrow the scope of a contract under Indonesian law. The article concludes that ketiadaan tindakan is the safest terminological equivalent and offers practical guidelines for choosing the right rendering in context.
|
»
When “Provide” Means Availability, Not Delivery: A Contract Translation Example
|
|
This article examines how the English verb *provide* can require different Indonesian equivalents depending on its contractual function. Using an anonymized English–Indonesian contract example, it explains why *menyediakan* may be more accurate than *memberikan* when the clause concerns the availability of a service rather than its actual delivery. The discussion highlights the importance of contextual reading, semantic analysis, and event sequencing in legal translation, showing that precise translation depends not only on dictionary meaning but also on preserving the logic and relationships expressed in the source text.
|
»
Interpreting in Malaysia: Historical Development, Current Conditions and Future Prospects
|
The evolution of interpreting and translation in Malaysia, from the pre-islamic period to our current days and what may come after 2027.
|
No articles found.
|
|
printer version
