Parliamentary committee today 18.12.2024 - watch online if interested Sledi avtorju: Tom in London
|
|---|
Tom in London
Združeno kraljestvo
Local time: 12:16
Član (2008)
italijanščina - angleščina
Subject: Interpreting and translation services in the courts
Witness(es): Sarah Sackman MP, Minister of State, Ministry of Justice; Daniel Flury, Operations Director, HM Courts and Tribunals Service; Nick Goodwin, Chief Executive, HM Courts and Tribunals Service
https://tinyurl.com/22zxkg3h
| | | |
in the american tv show Jinx in the second season, there was an AI equipment in the court.
I'm guessing that the Brits are trying to do the same thing. While one is speaking, the voice recognition is in action and speech to text is shown on screen. And I'm guessing that this text can be easily translated with AI immediately.
There are plenty countries who are already implementin... See more in the american tv show Jinx in the second season, there was an AI equipment in the court.
I'm guessing that the Brits are trying to do the same thing. While one is speaking, the voice recognition is in action and speech to text is shown on screen. And I'm guessing that this text can be easily translated with AI immediately.
There are plenty countries who are already implementing AI services, for example Greece
https://www.athenarc.gr/en/news/one-first-seven-ai-factories-eu-be-established-greece-pharos-places-greece-artificial ▲ Collapse
| | | | Tom in London
Združeno kraljestvo
Local time: 12:16
Član (2008)
italijanščina - angleščina
S TEMO ZAČEL
1. Interesting, but if you (hopefully never) find yourself on trial for murder in a court in the (e.g.) the UK would you have complete confidence that the AI interpreting is complete and accurate - and if there is no human interpreter present to verify?
2. Don't be fooled by the low-key polite understated tone of this meeting. This is war! The people answering the questions are trying desperately to defend their protected position, and the committee members are giving them a hard time. Hanging over the whole proceeding is the prior decision, of the committee, to suspend the bidding process for the new contract and this has the three visitors shìtting themselves although in true British fashion, they do their best to hide it.
[Edited at 2024-12-18 13:51 GMT]
| | | |
Tom in London wrote:
1. Interesting, but if you (hopefully never) find yourself on trial for murder in a court in the (e.g.) the UK would you have complete confidence that the AI interpreting is complete and accurate - and if there is no human interpreter present to verify?
2. Don't be fooled by the low-key polite understated tone of this meeting. This is war! The people answering the questions are trying desperately to defend their protected position, and the committee members are giving them a hard time. Hanging over the whole proceeding is the prior decision, of the committee, to suspend the bidding process for the new contract and this has the three visitors shìtting themselves although in true British fashion, they do their best to hide it. [Edited at 2024-12-18 13:51 GMT]
Well, I can't do anything about implementing AI in court, that's for sure. That's UK committee's decision. All I was saying was that AI equipment was already used in court, but not for translating, more like Stephen Hawking's, but in reverse. And also translating is possible, and about the accuracy, well...
I watched couple of minutes of your stream, and they were all nervous.
[Edited at 2024-12-18 14:37 GMT]
| | |
|
|
|
Daryo
Združeno kraljestvo
Local time: 12:16
srbščina - angleščina
+ ...
| Thanks for the tip. | Dec 18, 2024 |
Missed it, will watch it later.
Let me make an educated guess: at no point in time there wasn't even a hint about the big elephant in the room, i.e. the wisdom of giving a total monopoly on language services for ALL courts to just one company?
With the predictable - and intended - result of the monopolist abusing its monopol and only bored housewives, students & Co having any interested in working for peanuts. If they considered THAT perfectly normal for years, ... See more Missed it, will watch it later.
Let me make an educated guess: at no point in time there wasn't even a hint about the big elephant in the room, i.e. the wisdom of giving a total monopoly on language services for ALL courts to just one company?
With the predictable - and intended - result of the monopolist abusing its monopol and only bored housewives, students & Co having any interested in working for peanuts. If they considered THAT perfectly normal for years, watch out for the next "improvement" ...
Would love to be proved wrong, but it’s not likely. ▲ Collapse
| | | | Ta forum nima izrecno določenega moderatorja. Obrnite se na osebje spletišča », če bi radi sporočili prestopek proti pravilom ali pa če potrebujete pomoč. Parliamentary committee today 18.12.2024 - watch online if interested | Wordfast Pro | Translation Memory Software for Any Platform
Exclusive discount for ProZ.com users!
Save over 13% when purchasing Wordfast Pro through ProZ.com. Wordfast is the world's #1 provider of platform-independent Translation Memory software. Consistently ranked the most user-friendly and highest value
Buy now! » |
| | Protemos translation business management system | Create your account in minutes, and start working! 3-month trial for agencies, and free for freelancers!
The system lets you keep client/vendor database, with contacts and rates, manage projects and assign jobs to vendors, issue invoices, track payments, store and manage project files, generate business reports on turnover profit per client/manager etc.
More info » |
|
| | | | X Sign in to your ProZ.com account... | | | | | |
Login to reply/comment 
